US Regional Patent Offices Are All Up and Running

US Regional Patent Offices Are All Up and Running

The last of the Regional Patent Offices is up and running.  Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Michelle Lee recently attended a ribbon cutting ceremony to open the Texas Region Office of the USPTO. 

The Texas Regional Office is the last of the satellite offices for the USPTO.  Others are located in Detroit, Silicon Valley and Denver.  The satellite offices were opened to help recruit talented patent examiners from around the country, help decrease the backlog of patent cases to be examined, and to establish offices of expertise.   

The addition of four patent offices has decreased the average time to examination and to issue.   In addition, the regional patent offices have enable the USPTO to hire patent examiners with the expertise needed to handle areas of advanced and cutting edge areas of technology.  The regional patent offices also offer services to small businesses and entrepreneurs that will be offered to the communities in each of the regional areas. 

A statement recently released by the USPTO describes the importance of the regional offices by recognizing that “it’s important to ensure the USPTO can engage effectively with communities, industries, and innovators. The USPTO’s regional offices play a crucial role in these efforts, assisting inventors, entrepreneurs, and small businesses in their respective regions, while supporting the USPTO’s core mission of fostering American innovation and competitiveness.”

Identifying, protecting and leveraging intellectual property is critical to any organization.  Having the right person to help you make those decisions is important.  The Law Office of Kathleen Lynch PLLC is designed to help businesses such as yours keep ahead of the game.   The first telephone consultation is free.  Email us at kl****@*****aw.com.

Do We Already Have the Technology to Solve Global Warming?

Do We Already Have the Technology to Solve Global Warming?

A recent article in Bloomberg News poses the question: do we already have the technology needed to solve global warming?  Representatives from all over the world are finishing up in Paris trying to agree on climate accord. Entrepreneurs and investors are ready to tackle the challenges regardless.   

Wealthy donors agreed to invest $2 billion for development in the area of clean energy research. Twenty of the world’s largest economies agreed to increase their R&D spending on new energy by at least 200%. Clean-energy patents have significantly increased in the US in recent years.

The recent focus on climate saving technology and the need to reduce global warming has reopened the divide between two schools of thought: should we invent new technologies or deploy effective ideas that already exist? 

One clean-energy entrepreneur Jigar Shah submits that all of the technology needed to solve the global warming crisis is already here.  Some technologies include sharing economy businesses such as Uber and Airbnb, but others include companies that reward good behavior or that make wearable sensors that interact with a smartphone to report air quality in the immediate vicinity.

One of Pure Energy’s managing partners, Nicholas Eisenberger, states that there’s an “unloved, unnoticed tech center that’s up and coming and that can do a big part of the job, too. Why isn’t there more attention to this?” 

Capitalizing on innovative developments is critical to any organization.  Having the right person to help you make those decisions is important.  The Law Office of Kathleen Lynch PLLC is designed to help businesses such as yours keep ahead of the game.   The first telephone consultation is free.  Email us at kl****@*****aw.com.

US Regional Patent Offices Are All Up and Running

Chinese Patent Troll Takes on Apple

For years now western countries have been complaining about the lack of enforcement of intellectual property laws in China.  Well, that may be changing if this recent case is any indicator.  A Chinese company has recently sued Apple for patent infringement on a number of different patents it has amassed in its patent portfolio.

Chinese company BYD has sued Apple and five other companies in the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court for patent infringement related to the antennae in the iPhone 6 as well as other technology.  BYD has asked the court to order Apple to stop manufacture and assembly of the iPhones as a result of the alleged infringement.

BYD has stated that it owns over 12,000 patents in China and roughly 8000 internationally.  This infringement suit against Apple could be critical to Apple’s ability to manufacture phones and other Apple products in China.  China is where a significant majority of Apple products are made.  This action may seriously hamper Apple’s manufacturing and supply chain and may force it to diversify its manufacturing and assembly sites worldwide.

What’s the take away here?  BYD has managed to create a significant patent portfolio and is positioned itself to challenge Apple.  Any intellectual property portfolio must be managed in a strategic way so as to meet the business goals of the organization.  

Protecting your innovative developments is critical to any organization.  Having the right person to help you make that decision is important.  The Law Office of Kathleen Lynch PLLC is designed to help businesses such as yours keep ahead of the game.   The first telephone consultation is free.  Email us at kl****@*****aw.com.

Biotech in a Box: GE Ships Prefab Factory to China

Biotech in a Box: GE Ships Prefab Factory to China

Drug manufacturers are trying to speed up the process from drug development to full scale manufacturing in areas such as China.  General Electric is helping by literally shipping ready-made factories right off the shelf.  The video of the development can be seen here.

In September, GE shipped its first pre-fabricated biopharmaceutical factory from Germany to China. The building was made up of 62 containers. Once it arrived, the factory was assembled and built in 11 days.

GE states that the one single manufacturing concept can be replicated around the world with the use of the pre-fab factory concept. The advantage of this system enables highly specific and complex machinery to be preinstalled.  This enables the assembled factory to take advantage of world class expertise in a multitude of professions without getting on a plane.   

These GE prefab factories are sold under the mark “KUBio”. The demand for additional pharmaceutical and biotechnology manufacturing facilities, as well as other industries, could increase demand for these prefabricated manufacturing facilities.  GE submits that the costs to make and assemble the prefab factory can reduce overall construction costs by 45%. 

The prefab factories are designed and built to be identical anywhere in the world.  So if you were to assemble one in China it would be the same to one in Switzerland.  That’s good news for the pharmaceutical inspection process as well. 

Protecting your innovative developments is critical to any organization.  Having the right person to help you make that decision is important.  The Law Office of Kathleen Lynch PLLC is designed to help businesses such as yours keep ahead of the game.   The first telephone consultation is free.  Email us at kl****@*****aw.com.

DIY Patent Searches: Good Luck with That

DIY Patent Searches: Good Luck with That

Recently I’ve found websites and blog posts promoting your ability to conduct your own patent search.  Unless your invention is extremely straightforward, I would not recommend doing that. 

The U.S. Patent Office was created in 1802.  As such, issued patents were organized by categories or classes and subclasses.  As innovation has evolved, the categories of classes and subclasses has evolved and changed considerably.  Unless you are extremely familiar with the patent records organization, you are better off spending your money on a professional searcher who will find all of the relevant categorical nooks and crannies.  Often times a material, process or structure in your invention may have applicability in areas you have not considered.  These need to be identified and pursued in order to obtain a full and thorough search. 

Patentability must be based on a complete search to have value.  If not, you are spending good money after bad by investing in the preparation and filing of a patent application based on incomplete patent search results.  You are better off knowing that your invention is unpatentable than spending money on the preparation and filing of a meaningless application.  In addition, your application, and particularly your claims, can be tailored to that patentable space defined not only by your invention but by the relevant prior art found in a good search. 

Capitalizing on innovative developments is critical to any organization.  Having the right person to help you make those decisions is important.  The Law Office of Kathleen Lynch PLLC is designed to help businesses such as yours keep ahead of the game.   The first telephone consultation is free.  Email us at kl****@*****aw.com.

When Fashion and Graffiti Collide

When Fashion and Graffiti Collide

Joseph Tierney, is a well known street artist known as “Rime”.  He sued fashion designer, Jeremy Scott and high-end Italian apparel brand, Moschino over the dress Katy Perry wore to the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Met Gala in May.

Rime accused Moschino and Scott of copying one his giant murals entitled “Vandal Eyes,” which is now located on the side of a Detroit building, and displaying the mural on Perry’s dress. The name and signature of Rime were also on the dress.   The dress and mural can be seen here.

Rime is bringing copyright, unfair competition and publicity rights claims against Moschino and Scott.

Rime states that the dress, which violated his rights, was also worn by supermodel Gigi Hadid at a the February 2015 Moschino runway show in Milan. In addition, photos of the dress are on the company’s websites as well as social media.  Court documents reference The Wall Street Journal as reporting Moschino experienced a 16 percent increase in revenue for the first quarter of 2015. 

Rime is asking the court to stop any further marketing or sale of the dresses as well as all profits made from the sale or any dresses, and other monetary damages.

What’s the take away here?  Don’t copy someone else’s material.  If you find something you like, ask if you can use it.  If you cannot, create something yourself or go elsewhere. 

Protecting your innovative developments is critical to any organization.  Having the right person to help you make that decision is important.  The Law Office of Kathleen Lynch PLLC is designed to help businesses such as yours keep ahead of the game.   The first telephone consultation is free.  Email us at kl****@*****aw.com.